Forums

  1. Structural Design

    1. Actions on Structures

      Ask questions about Eurocode 1 e.g. wind loads, snow loads, load combinations.

      722
      posts
    2. Concrete Structures

      Design of reinforced concrete structures according to Eurocode 2.

      1305
      posts
    3. Steel & Composite Structures

      Design of steel and composite structures according to Eurocode 3 & 4.

      1406
      posts
    4. 290
      posts
    5. Geotechnical Design

      Geotechnical design according to Eurocode 7.

      178
      posts
    6. Seismic Design

      Seismic design of structures according to Eurocode 8.

      305
      posts
    7. Structural Analysis Methods

      Linear-Elastic, Plastic, Pushover, Dynamic etc.

      129
      posts
    8. Aluminium & Structural Glass Structures

      Everything about Eurocode 9 and structural glass.

      14
      posts
    9. Bridge Design

      Bridge design according to part 2 of Eurocodes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 8.

      138
      posts
  2. Tools

    1. Finite Element & Simulation Methods

      Does FEM confuse you? Come here for help.

      221
      posts
    2. Spreadsheets & Free Structural Analysis Programs

      Post questions on free structural engineering programs.

      246
      posts
    3. AutoCAD

      Come here for help with AutoCAD.

      65
      posts
    4. Useful Books & Websites

      Post here links from books or websites that may help our members.

      130
      posts
  3. Educational Update

    1. Bachelor and Masters

      Confused about your career path? Find all the advice you need here!

      12
      posts
    2. Doctorate

      If research appeals to you check out this section!

      8
      posts
  4. General

    1. Introductions & Greets

      New to DesignToEurocodes.com? Start off here with a quick hello to introduce yourself!

      1060
      posts
    2. Chat & News

      Share your news with us! The most interesting of which will be posted on the front page!

      79
      posts
    3. Special Offers!

      Are you the owner of a structural analysis software company? Make a special offer to our members here!

      22
      posts
    4. DesignToEurocodes.com

      Give us your feedback about DesignToEurocodes.com. Make suggestions and post bug reports.

      73
      posts
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3 Guests (See full list)

  • Forum Statistics

    1454
    Total Topics
    6417
    Total Posts


  • Posts

    • Agree about the tensile stresses... some of my first work as an engineer was related to failure of amalgams secured to teeth with steel pins.  I met a dentist in the student union building at the University and after a little chat asked what he was studying.  He was investigating the failure of amalgam fillings.  I asked him what the material was like and he said it had a high compressive strength and a low tensile strength, very much like concrete.  I asked him if it could be a tensile fatigue failure generated by the tensile stresses at the bearing of the amalgam and the steel pin.  Did some FEM models using a 3D FEM program I had written and then we did additional studies using plastic and polarised light. Was fun...   Reinforcing is another issue for bearing.  The ACI and CSA codes allow the increase in bearing stress just due to the confining nature of the loaded concrete with a small area loading a large area of concrete.   Dik
    •   I'm not sure about ACI and CSA guidelines, although it seems obvious that if there is compression stress spread there is tension which should be carried by reinforcement.   Anyway, EC2 allows increase of up to 3 times of the design strength of concrete for crushing and spalling resistance (first potential failure mechanism) of the "partially" loaded area but the designer also needs to check the area for bursting (second potential failure mechanism), which should generally be done by strut-and-tie design of adequate reinforcement. If this reinforcement is provided and bursting is not the governing failure mechanism, then one can take advantage of the increased crushing/spalling resistance.   Not particularly allowed by EC, but "FIB Model Code 1990" (which is basically the basis of EC) allowed potentially increased bursting capacity for bulging compressive struts (which basically is this "partially" loaded area case where compression stresses spread out in a larger area) which are not adequately reinforced and the capacity (allowable bearing pressure) was influenced by the geometry of the bulging strut and the design tensile strength of the concrete. Of course this method could only be used for regions which where not expected to crack in the life of the structure because of any other influences/actions like shrinkage, etc. If cracking was expected and no bursting reinforcement provided then the bearing pressures allowed would be (by EC) around 53% of concrete compressive design strength.       
    • Hi engineers, There are tabulated data in "EC 1992-1-2 General rules. Structural fire design" for columns, but only for braced ones. What about unbraced ones? Any suggestions?
    • Can you kindly give a download link?  Many thanks
    • Excuse me but, how do you save a calculation in Gala Reinforcement? Don't know how to do that... :/
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      3902
    • Most Online
      61

    Newest Member
    Eng.Ahmed Taha
    Joined