Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Occupation
    Bachelor Student
    Expert in
    Concrete Structures
    Location
    Selangor, Malaysia
    Posts
    4

    Simplification of curtailment rules as per EC2.

    Hello people,
    Do any one of you know how to come up with a simplified curtailment figure for beams and slabs for EC 2 as the one in bs 8110. Like which assumptions are made in taking the curtailment length and rebar percentages? What is the theory involved in it and so on. I need some help for my thesis work regarding it. Please share your thoughts. Any help will be very much appreciated. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Occupation
    Structural Engineer
    Expert in
    Steel Structures
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    740
    I will try to explain the theory behind curtailment as good as I can...

    Theoretically speaking, curtailment of reinforcing bars is the stopping of some of them (in tension or compression), where they are no longer required because the bending moment is reduced. This is the theoretical curtailment point/length.

    However, the bars must be anchored by further extension (lbd) beyond the point which is required for flexural strength. Moreover, inclined cracks due to shear, especially at supports, may increase the forces subjected to the tensile reinforcement. According to the attached image, because of the shear crack, the force of the tensile reinforcement at position 1 is depended on the bending moment at position 2. In order to take this into account, the bending moment diagram is shifted in the direction of reducing moment by an amount al (=d in case of slabs). Therefore, the bars should be anchored for a distance lbd+al. This is the practical curtailment point/length!

    It’s very important to mention that curtailment is applied mainly to multi-span slabs and beams because it is more economic compared to simply supported.

    As for the simplified rules about curtailment according to Concrete Centre, British Standards etc is concerned, these are just simple tips based on the above theoretical background, experiments and everyday experience. I don’t think that these lengths and reinforcement percentages are derived only from mathematical expressions...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Curtailment_Shear.jpg 
Views:	423 
Size:	21.4 KB 
ID:	276

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Occupation
    Bachelor Student
    Expert in
    Concrete Structures
    Location
    Selangor, Malaysia
    Posts
    4
    Thanks for the reply ion..

    Well suppose the simplified detailing diagrams were to be derived mathematically, can you please give a break down of working steps which can lead me to the simplified diagrams. I saw the simplified diagram posted on slabs based on EC2.. but i am quiet not sure how the lengths and percentages are derived..

  4. #4
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Occupation
    Structural Engineer
    Expert in
    Steel Structures
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    740
    No problem aciyath!

    Curtailment lengths depend on the bending moment diagram and the geometry of the slabs (number of spans and supports) therefore the simplified rules are not based on one mathematical model. Practically you can not have only one theoretical model that simulates all the slabs you can have...

    A very good approach would be to calculate the curtailment lengths for some characteristic slabs (simply supported, continuous with two spans, three spans etc) and then to check if these curtailment lengths are in accordance with the Concrete Centre's approach.

    As for the procedure that you have to follow for the calculation of the curtailment lengths, check the following bibliography:
    Worked Examples to Eurocode 2: Volume 1 (page 40)
    How to Design Concrete Structures Using Eurocode 2 (page 84)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Occupation
    Civil Engineer
    Expert in
    Concrete Structures
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    396
    Do any one of you know how to come up with a simplified curtailment figure for beams and slabs for EC 2 as the one in bs 8110
    In EC2 there is no simplified curtailment figure like the 3.24&3.25/BS8110. In fact 3.25 for slabs is quite ok but for beams, analysis of moment diagrams is necessary.

    Don't forget that in general, eurocodes are not a simplified code framework whatever that thing means.
    houston, we've got a problem

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Occupation
    Civil Engineer
    Expert in
    Concrete Structures
    Location
    La Chapelle Agnon, France
    Posts
    410
    Yes indeed! In the UK, we say that the Eurocodes are "less prescriptive" than the former British Standards. This means the engineer is bit more 'on his/her own'.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Simplified curtailment rules for slabs.
    By Ion in forum Concrete Structures
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 30-09-2012, 09:13

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0
Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
DesignToEurocodes.com
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB